![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:42 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
It’ll always be a mustang II
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
especially when it has a 2.3 4 pot under the hood
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:49 |
|
No shit.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:51 |
|
Nice Pinto, bro.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:53 |
|
what about racecar?
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:54 |
|
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:55 |
|
Just saying that the 2.3 is a word renowned racing engine.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:55 |
|
I’d rather have that than a 94-04 mustang.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:55 |
|
88HP would have been sporty on a riding mower...
![]() 01/10/2016 at 18:55 |
|
Mustang II with a Triton V10
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:01 |
|
I can’t wait until its front suspension is taken out.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:10 |
|
We all know the real reason it’s called number 2.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:15 |
|
What if the 2.3L 4-pot is the new EcoBoost?
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:16 |
|
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:42 |
|
Dude, good first car. Fit 302's in there. I would slap an 302 and a 5 speed auto. Auto X. But I remember what P.O.S. they were.
The paint job is Ironic.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:45 |
|
$2000?! Christ. CP
![]() 01/10/2016 at 19:46 |
|
Once I intimated that the Mustang II was actually the Pinto III on Jalopnik, and I was roundly lambasted.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 20:50 |
|
I’m not sure which of the three it is, but there’s at least one extra zero in that price...
![]() 01/10/2016 at 20:55 |
|
![]() 01/11/2016 at 06:48 |
|
Came here to post that. They had to extend the wheelbase by a good few inches to make it fit and that just sorts out the looks perfectly. Stunning car :)